California womancivil libertiesconstitutional rightscourt decisionfederal officialshusband denied entryimmigration lawimmigration policyimmigration restrictionsjudicial reviewlegal caselegal precedent.rights violationSupreme Court rulingtattoos interpretationUS immigration
What was the basis for the federal officials' decision to deny entry to the woman's husband?
The federal officials cited the interpretation of the husband's tattoos as one of the reasons for denying his entry into the country.
What was the California woman's argument in her case before the Supreme Court?
The California woman argued that her rights were violated when federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country.
What was the outcome of the Supreme Court ruling in this case?
The Supreme Court ruled against the California woman, upholding the decision of the federal officials to deny entry to her husband.