Judge Cannon is not convinced that Trump will face another gag order. The judge expressed skepticism about the need to restrict Trump's speech after he made false claims that the FBI was 'ready to take me out' during a hearing at Mar-a-Lago.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case challenging states' bans on gender-affirming care for transgender youth. Over 20 states have implemented measures to limit or prohibit access to healthcare that supports the gender identity of young transgender individuals.

A judge in Washington state has decided to temporarily halt certain provisions of a new parental rights law that has faced criticism for being a form of "forced outing." The law, which has been heavily criticized by opponents, has been put on hold by the judge in response to the concerns raised. The law in question has been described as a measure that could potentially force individuals to disclose their sexual orientation or gender identity to their children's other parent, even if they are not comfortable doing so. Critics argue that this could put LGBTQ+ individuals in a difficult and potentially dangerous position, as they may face discrimination or harm if their sexual orientation or gender identity is revealed without their consent. The decision to pause parts of the law comes as a relief to those who have been vocal in their opposition to it. It is seen as a step in the right direction towards protecting the rights and privacy of LGBTQ+ individuals in Washington state. Overall, the judge's decision to put certain provisions of the parental rights law on hold is a positive development for those who have been concerned about the potential consequences of the legislation. It remains to be seen what further actions will be taken in response to the criticisms and concerns raised by opponents of the law.

Julie Chrisley, known for her appearances on reality TV, is facing a new sentencing in a bank fraud and tax evasion case after federal appeals judges overturned her original sentence. The judges have ruled that the lower court must reevaluate and determine a new punishment for Chrisley.

The Supreme Court has made a decision against a woman from California who claimed that her rights were infringed upon when immigration officials denied entry to her husband. The decision was based, in part, on the interpretation of her husband's tattoos.