Question 1: What is the main argument presented by Chris Mason regarding Starmer's approach to leadership?
Chris Mason argues that Starmer's willingness to embrace unpopularity in pursuit of his goals carries inherent risks, particularly if the outcomes do not meet public expectations.
Question 2: How might a large majority affect Starmer's leadership according to the article?
While a colossal majority could provide some political leverage, it may not fully protect Starmer from backlash if his delivery on promises is perceived as inadequate by the public.
Question 3: What potential consequences does Mason highlight for Starmer if he fails to deliver on his commitments?
Mason highlights that if Starmer's delivery falls short, he could face significant disappointment and criticism from the electorate, which could undermine his leadership and future political capital.
Question 4: Why is public perception important for political leaders like Starmer?
Public perception is crucial for political leaders because it influences their legitimacy, support, and ability to implement policies effectively. Disappointment can lead to a loss of trust and support from constituents.