Update cookies preferences

“Chaos Reigns: The Tory Leadership Contest Descends into Madness at Birmingham Conference”

** at the Tory Conference in Birmingham** As the leadership contenders compete to outdo one another in absurdity, it’s no surprise that Boris Johnson has once again stolen the spotlight with his outrageous antics. Consider the perspective of the so-called Fearless Four. Having already dispatched formidable opponents like and , they now find themselves in the chaotic arena of the Birmingham conference. They’ve plunged into a dismal environment where rational thought seems to have vanished, leaving behind only the clinically insane and the hopelessly misguided. In this bizarre setting, the most sensible voice might just be that of ’s infamous rug, yearning for a return to sanity. Welcome to the Tory party conference, a true spectacle of political madness.

Question 1: What is the main theme of John Crace's article regarding the Tory party conference in Birmingham?

Answer: The main theme of the article is the chaotic and extreme nature of the Tory party conference, where leadership contenders are competing to outdo each other in outrageousness, leading to a lack of moderation and rational discourse.

Question 2: Who does Crace suggest is the most outrageous contender among the leadership candidates?

Answer: Crace suggests that Boris Johnson is the most outrageous contender, implying that he has outdone the other candidates in terms of craziness.

Question 3: How does Crace describe the environment of the Tory party conference?

Answer: Crace describes the environment as a "mephitic swamp" devoid of intelligent life, where only the "clinically deranged and terminally deluded" can be found, highlighting the absurdity of the situation.

Question 4: What metaphor does Crace use to illustrate the state of the Tory party conference?

Answer: Crace uses the metaphor of Michael Fabricant's rug, suggesting that even an inanimate object like the rug longs to escape the madness of the conference, emphasizing the absurdity of the proceedings.