What influenced Hugh Grant’s decision to settle his court claim against The Sun’s publisher for an “enormous sum,” and how does his commitment to press reform advocacy play a role in this settlement?

Hugh Grant's decision to settle his court claim against The Sun's publisher for an "enormous sum" was influenced by the potential financial risks associated with a trial, where he could have faced legal costs amounting to around £10 million. By accepting the settlement offer, Grant avoided the uncertainty and expenses that come with prolonged litigation. Additionally, his commitment to press reform advocacy played a role in this settlement as he pledged to redirect the settlement money towards funding press reform campaign groups like Hacked Off. Grant's dedication to promoting ethical journalism practices and holding media organizations accountable for their actions is evident in his decision to pursue legal action and secure a favorable settlement. This settlement not only reflects his determination to seek justice and accountability for alleged unlawful activities but also highlights the financial risks and complexities involved in challenging powerful media entities. Grant's strategic approach to resolving the legal dispute through a settlement demonstrates his unwavering commitment to promoting transparency and accountability in the media industry.