What contradictions and concerns were raised during Angela Van Den Bogerd’s testimony at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry regarding her knowledge of the Horizon system’s capabilities, and how has this impacted the ongoing investigation into the scandal?

During Angela Van Den Bogerd's testimony at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry, contradictions and concerns were raised regarding her knowledge of the Horizon system's capabilities. One of the main contradictions was her claim of not recalling being informed that Fujitsu employees could remotely access sub-postmasters' branch accounts, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. This contradiction has fueled skepticism about her involvement in the scandal and has raised questions about the transparency and accountability within the Post Office leadership. The impact of these contradictions and concerns on the ongoing investigation into the scandal is significant. The lack of clarity and transparency surrounding Van Den Bogerd's awareness of the system's functionalities has added complexity to the inquiry. It has also led to further scrutiny of her actions and potential involvement in misleading sub-postmasters about the Horizon system's capabilities. The contradictions in her testimony have raised doubts about the credibility of the Post Office leadership and have highlighted the need for thorough investigations and accountability. Overall, Angela Van Den Bogerd's testimony has brought to light crucial discrepancies and concerns that have deepened the ongoing investigation into the Horizon scandal. The contradictions in her knowledge of the system's capabilities have underscored the need for transparency, accountability, and justice for the victims of the scandal. The inquiry continues to uncover the truth behind the wrongful convictions and systemic failures, with a focus on holding responsible parties accountable and ensuring that those affected receive the redress they deserve.