At a recent rally in Pennsylvania, former President Donald Trump addressed a crowd that erupted in chants of "Send them back" as he criticized immigrants, claiming they have "destroyed" cities like London and Paris. While Trump seeks to galvanize support in this key swing state, a new poll indicates that Vice President Kamala Harris is currently leading him by five points.

Trump has announced plans for mass deportation efforts, starting in an Ohio town where he made controversial claims about Haitian immigrants allegedly eating pets. It's important to note that many Haitian immigrants currently hold Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which safeguards them from deportation.

Kamala's 'audio earrings' and other unfounded debate conspiracies During the recent debates, former President Trump made a series of outrageous claims, including the assertion that immigrants are responsible for pet consumption and that Democrats endorse infanticide. These statements, lacking any credible evidence, have sparked widespread criticism and disbelief. One of the more peculiar claims involved Vice President Kamala Harris, who was accused of using 'audio earrings' to receive answers during the debate. This conspiracy theory, like many others circulating in the political arena, has no basis in reality and serves to distract from substantive discussions. As the political landscape continues to be marred by such unfounded allegations, it is crucial for voters to remain vigilant and seek out verified information rather than succumbing to sensationalist narratives.

Trump Reiterates False Claims About Immigrants Eating Pets, Leaving Harris Stunned Former President Donald Trump has once again made unfounded allegations regarding immigrants in Ohio, claiming they are consuming pets. This assertion has left many, including Vice President Kamala Harris, taken aback as Trump veers further off course in his rhetoric. Despite the lack of evidence supporting his claims, Trump continues to promote these sensational stories, which have sparked confusion and disbelief among his audience. The repeated nature of these statements raises questions about the impact of misinformation in political discourse.