During the recent presidential debate, Vice President Kamala Harris addressed the pressing issue of climate change, emphasizing the concern that young Americans have for the environment. She highlighted the fact that the United States has achieved record levels of domestic oil production. This statement sparked discussions about fracking, misinformation, and various climate-related topics. Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a method used to extract oil and natural gas from deep underground. While it has contributed to increased energy production in the U.S., it has also raised significant environmental concerns, including potential water contamination and increased greenhouse gas emissions. Critics argue that the environmental costs of fracking may outweigh its economic benefits. In the context of the debate, Harris's remarks about oil production prompted a closer examination of the claims surrounding energy policies and their impact on climate change. Some opponents have made false claims about the effectiveness of certain energy practices, leading to confusion among the public. It is crucial for voters to discern fact from fiction when evaluating candidates' positions on climate issues. As the conversation around climate change continues to evolve, it remains essential to consider the implications of energy production methods like fracking and to hold leaders accountable for their environmental policies. The concerns of younger generations regarding climate change are more relevant than ever, and their voices will play a significant role in shaping future discussions and actions on this critical issue.