“New York Attorney General Challenges Trump’s ‘Impossible’ Appeal Bond Claim in $464 Million Fraud Case”

# New York Attorney General Criticizes Donald Trump's Claim on attorney general's office has criticized Donald Trump's claim that it was "impossible" for him to obtain an appeal bond in his $464 million business fraud case. The office argued that if Trump was truly unable to secure a bond, he should have pledged his real estate to the courts. The AG's office also stated that Trump did not provide any hard evidence for his claim and did not supply documentary evidence of the real property offered to potential insurers. The office made this argument as it asked the court to reject Trump's request to stop his massive fraud judgment from coming due. ## Attorney General's Office Challenges Trump's attorney general's office has raised concerns about former President Donald Trump's assertion that he could not secure an appeal bond in his $464 million business fraud case. The office has emphasized that if Trump genuinely faced challenges in obtaining a bond, he should have considered pledging his real estate assets to the courts as an alternative. Furthermore, the office has questioned the lack of substantial evidence supporting Trump's claim and the absence of documentary proof regarding the real property offered to potential insurers. These points were presented as the office urged the court to dismiss Trump's plea to halt the enforcement of the substantial fraud judgment. ## 's legal team stated that it was exceedingly difficult for him to obtain a bond after facing rejections from 30 insurance companies. However, the attorney general's office has urged the appeals court to disregard Trump's claim and has cast doubt on the evidence presented by his lawyers concerning the real property offered to potential bond insurers. The office's stance underscores the contentious nature of the situation, particularly as Trump faces a deadline to post the bond unless the appeals court grants his motion to delay payment until after the appeal is heard. ## Media Coverage and Varying Perspectives The news of the dispute between Donald Trump and the New York attorney general's office has been reported by several media outlets, including CNN, CNBC, and KRDO. It is important to note that these reports may exhibit varying degrees of factuality and bias, highlighting the complexity of the situation and the divergent perspectives surrounding it. In conclusion, the criticism from the New York attorney general's office regarding Donald Trump's claim on the appeal bond underscores the contentious nature of the situation. The dispute over the availability of insurance company support and the evidentiary challenges surrounding Trump's claim further contribute to the complexity of the case. As the legal proceedings unfold, it remains to be seen how the court will address these conflicting assertions and the potential implications for the enforcement of the substantial fraud judgment.