Update cookies preferences

“Assessing Ten Hag’s Transfers: A £600m Spending Spree with Disappointing Returns”

**Ten Hag's : Antony's Disappointment Sets the Tone for United's ** In the span of five transfer windows and a staggering £600 million expenditure, Manchester United has seen few new arrivals make a notable positive impact. The first signing of Erik ten Hag's tenure was a player who met the crucial criterion of having experience in the Eredivisie. However, it's challenging to assess his contributions, as he last played in June 2023. The left-back had a decent number of appearances in his inaugural season, but a knee injury has sidelined him for the past 16 months. **Rating: 1/5** Overall, the transfer strategy under Ten Hag has raised concerns, with Antony's underwhelming performance setting a disappointing precedent for the club's recruitment efforts.

Question 1: What has been the overall impact of Erik ten Hag's transfers at Manchester United?

The overall impact has been largely negative, with few arrivals making a significant positive contribution despite a substantial spend of £600 million over five transfer windows.

Question 2: Who was the first signing of the Erik ten Hag era?

The first signing of the Erik ten Hag era was a left-back who had previously played in the Eredivisie.

Question 3: What has affected the left-back's performance since joining Manchester United?

The left-back has been sidelined due to a knee injury, which has kept him out of action for 16 months, limiting his contributions to the team.

Question 4: How did the article rate the left-back's performance?

The article rated the left-back's performance as 1 out of 5, indicating a very poor impact on the team.

Question 5: What does the article suggest about the nature of Manchester United's transfer strategy under Ten Hag?

The article suggests that the transfer strategy has been slapdash, with the signing of players like Antony setting a negative tone for subsequent transfers.